new zealand shooting livestream video liveleak

NEW ZEALAND SHOOTING LIVESTREAM VIDEO LIVELEAK FULL

The attacker reloads frequently and returns to his vehicle to restock with more ammunition and weapons, emphasising the preparation that has gone into the attack.

The likely purpose of this type of flashing device is to disorient his already defenceless victims and make them less able to respond as he shoots them

The attacker tests, and then deploys, a strobe-like flash, mounted on an assault-style weapon.

In addition to the high extent and degree of promotional violence, killing and cruelty previously mentioned, the video contains other notable elements that promote or encourage criminal acts or acts of terrorism. Notwithstanding the clear application of s3(2)(f), the video can also be considered objectionable under s3(3)(d) due to the extent and degree to which, and the manner in which, the publication promotes or encourages criminal acts or acts of terrorism. The video is therefore considered to promote and support the infliction of extreme violence and cruelty. There is nothing present that denounces such activity.

The video is clearly intended to record, share and glorify the acts of extreme violence and cruelty depicted, namely the graphic mass murder of unsuspecting victims. The first-person perspective of the camera records the actions of the attacker, creating the disturbing effect of seeing the attack from his perspective.

The murders and bodies are shown in detail. Victims are shot and killed as they try to avoid the attacker, while they lie wounded, or while they try to protect others. The attacker repeatedly returns to the same building to inflict injury and death, while reloading or picking up new weapons. Under s3(2)(f) of the FVPC Act, this publication also promotes and supports the infliction of extreme violence or extreme cruelty. Much of the sound and imagery is horrific. It documents events immediately prior to, during, and after the mass murder of peaceful and unarmed civilians at a Christchurch mosque. The video in question deals with matters of horror, crime, cruelty and violence. Classification criteriaĪccording to Section 3(1) of the Films, Videos & Publications Classifications Act (FVPC Act) a publication is objectionable if it describes, depicts, expresses, or otherwise deals with matters such as sex, horror, crime, cruelty, or violence in such a manner that the availability of the publication is likely to be injurious to the public good. The Classification Office understands that the video was originally live-streamed on Facebook and subsequently uploaded to other websites and platforms. The audio track records him analysing his performance and the performance of his weaponry during the attack, before the video cuts out. The attacker then drives away from the crime scene, stopping to fire a shotgun through the windscreen, and also at pedestrians through the front passenger window.

Injuries and deaths are clearly depicted. The video depicts the shooting of many people, including men, women and at least one young person. He travels to his destination while listening to music in his car. The video features footage of the mass murder of worshippers in a New Zealand mosque viewed in a ‘first person’ perspective via a camera apparently fixed to the attacker’s helmet.Ī man is shown in a car with a large cache of weapons.

NEW ZEALAND SHOOTING LIVESTREAM VIDEO LIVELEAK FULL

For the full legal decision, please see the linked file at the end of this document.Ĭhristchurch Mosque Attack Livestream is a video of a terrorist attack in Christchurch. Please be advised some of the content discussed could be distressing for the reader. The following is an abridged version of our classification decision on the Christchurch Mosque Attack Livestream.

New zealand shooting livestream video liveleak